10-4 Magazine

Waynes World - March 2003

KEEPING YOU INFORMED ABOUT THE CHANGING RULES & REGULATIONS

USDOT & MC NUMBERS: IS
THERE A DIFFERENCE?

By Wayne Schooling

Q: I am confused about the difference between an ICC number and a USDOT number. Why do I need both?

A: This is a good question. To answer it, I'll focus this month's article on just that topic.

We are half-way into the new rules for identifying and marking commercial vehicles, used in interstate transportation, which became effective June 3, 2000. I thought it was a good time to refresh everyone’s mind. When implementation is complete in 2005, all interstate commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) transporting property or passengers will have their USDOT number on both sides of their power units, along with the legal name of the entity controlling the motor carrier operation.

The marking rules will no longer allow federally regulated for-hire carriers to continue displaying their Motor Carrier (MC) number instead of the USDOT number on their truck for identification. The regulations do not require removing the MC number, but carriers are encouraged not to display it on new or repainted CMVs.

This change has created questions about the role and function of the MC number issued to for-hire carriers when they are granted operating authority. This number, also known as an “ICC MC” number, has long been required by regulation to be displayed on the vehicle to identify “regulated” carriers under the jurisdiction of the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC). Special note: if you are in California, do not get this MC number confused with a Motor Carrier Permit (MCP) which is authority for-hire issued by the California Highway Patrol.

For-hire interstate carriers are subject to more stringent requirements under the federal leasing rules, so they must also file an application for operating authority (OP-1). The regulatory goal is to make sure for-hire carriers have sufficient financial responsibility coverage (insurance or cash) to compensate the public for liability arising from personal injury, property damage, cargo loss or damage, and property broker defaults.
The MC number, assigned when authority is granted, is used to identify carriers operating legally under these economic requirements. It has allowed the FMCSA, process agents, insurance companies, and shippers to verify the status of a carrier’s insurance coverage and ensure that freight is being tendered to a legally licensed and insured carrier. So, even though this number is no longer displayed on the vehicle, all for-hire carriers must still have operating authority and an MC number.

The MCS-150 Identification Report does not encompass the existing for-hire carrier regulatory requirements achieved through filing the OP-1 for carrier authority. The MC number indicates compliance with economic regulations by for-hire carriers, while use of the USDOT number was developed within the context of safety compliance.

The DOT safety effort concentrates on identifying and tracking the safety of all commercial vehicles. Through the MCS-150 Identification Report, the DOT can update the Motor Carrier Management Information System (MCMIS) and enforce carrier compliance with safety fitness procedures.

Federal involvement in motor carrier safety developed gradually. Oversight of motor carriage in the U.S. began in 1935 under the jurisdiction of the ICC. The agency was responsible for issuing operating authority and permits, and administering rules related to insurance, rates, routes, easing, and claims as they applied to for-hire common and contract carriers. It also had jurisdiction over safety and enforcement matters.

The ICC retained regulatory authority over for-hire economic issues until the agency was closed on January 1, 1996. However, the economic rules were not abolished with the agency. The remaining ICC registration and licensing rules were moved to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Under the FHWA, and now the FMCSA, regulatory procedures for registration of for-hire carriers remain. Continuous compliance with financial responsibility rules must be maintained, or operating authority can be revoked.

While economic regulation continued at the ICC until 1996, oversight of federal transportation safety functions was moved to the newly created Department of Transportation in 1967. In 1988, the DOT amended the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations and added a new section that required every commercial vehicle, operated by a private carrier of property in interstate commerce, to be marked with an identification number issued by the FHWA (USDOT number). In 1992, the rules were revised to require all carriers, including exempt carriers not included in the 1988 rule, to be marked with the USDOT number.

The 1992 change contained an exception that allowed for-hire ICC authorized carriers to comply with this requirement through the display of their ICC MC number. The recent marking rule revisions will bring uniformity to vehicle identification by requiring all carriers to be identified under the same system.

This issue will be formally addressed in the preparation and implementation of the congressionally mandated Unified Motor Carrier Registration System. While the FMCSA has decided the USDOT number will be the identifier used by all carriers under the new system, the current regulations still require for-hire carriers to obtain an operating authority MC number as well as a USDOT number.

But for now, motor carrier marking compliance simply means having and displaying a USDOT number on the power unit, and, whenever a carrier is for-hire, operating with federal authority and the MC number. If you have questions or don't understand all this, please feel free to call me at (562) 630-7637 or (800) 805-0040. Until next month, "Drive Safe - Drive Smart!"



Copyright © 2003 10-4 Magazine and Tenfourmagazine.com 
PO Box 7377 Huntington Beach, CA, 92615 tel. (714) 378-9990